Reducing Participatory Inequality

Many of our readings, today and in the past, focus on reducing the inequalities of our political system. Whether through institutions such as local councils or mediums like the Internet, authors seem concerned about access to the government and political efficacy for lower income citizens. When we started class, we seemed to agree that while no one should be forced to become politically active, there should not be any barriers in place for those who wish to participate.

I think that as that semester has progressed, authors have disagreed about what constitutes a barrier to participation. Some believe it is only something that actually keeps people out (when money counts for influence), while others define it more broadly as anything that might influence one's political action. In other words, how much should the government do in order ensure an equal playing field for all? Regulate biased media? Increase the quality of civics education in schools? Require or deemphasize volunteering?

Perhaps in asking these questions, we can get distracted from the reality of our civic life. Many citizens simply do not have the time or desire to participate in political life regularly. It seems unrealistic to expect widespread action, as the social networking article suggests. While it is certainly beneficial if the Internet increases political awareness, those who wish to have an impact will have to engage in more "costly" (time, money, labor) ways of participation,