If education does not explain this huge gender gap, then what does? We have talked before about the role that intimidation plays in discouraging people from becoming politically active.
It wasn't until 1920 that women were given the right to vote. Women are slowly gaining more higher level governmental roles but maybe the obvious disparity is still a powerful enough message to prevent women from taking an active role in the public realm. Is there something about the nature of political information that is not as appealing to women? The political world is often characterized as being unforgiving and harsh. The majority of women who enter high ranked government position have had the question asked about them: "Will she be able to stand strong when faced with a tough decision?" Hillary Clinton's experience as a Presidential nominee in 2008 is a great example of this. The political world is still a very masculine realm. It is highly possible that even though more women are receiving college educations, they are slower to penetrate the political world.
It may also be that the process of obtaining political knowledge is different than the way students study in order to have successful college careers. The act of seeking political knowledge requires one to feel that the information they are reading is somewhat relevant to their lives. Perhaps women are less likely to relate to the news stories that dominate the media and therefore will invest less time in educating themselves. A large portion of the U.S.'s involvement in international affairs are dominated by war and conflict. As only 20% of the U.S. military is made up of women, women may feel less connected to how the U.S. is fairing overseas. Few women hold high governmental positions. This may discourage women from becoming active and educated citizens if they feel they have no chance at being represented.
No comments:
Post a Comment